Fuji RAW File Processing Improvements

Posted on


Waterfall near Thirlmere i the Lake District. Fuji XT2.
Waterfall near Thirlmere i the Lake District. Fuji XT2.

Many of you will be aware of my frustration over the poor results when processing Fuji RAW files with Lightroom. This apparently is a well-known problem amongst Fuji users who want to shoot RAW (although it wasn’t well known to me when I purchased my XT1). The problem seems to have spawned many different solutions among users, from trying to work with Lightroom using “quite extreme” settings to adopting other RAW converters. I personally have pursued and experimented with this last option myself, but it’s not ideal. Lightroom is a great tool and provides an excellent workflow.

Then, a few weeks back I reported here that following experimentation, I was now able to achieve improved sharpening results when using Lightroom. This involved minimising the use of the Detail and Threshold slider, then applying a subsequent Structure adjustment in Viveza. What I couldn’t rationalise though is why I was now experiencing such an improvement by holding back on the Detail slider when previously it had often been necessary to push this to 100%.

Then the penny has dropped.

I had been contacted by a couple of Fuji users who asked if I was aware of any improvements to Fuji sharpening in the latest release of Lightroom and Photoshop. Whilst I hadn’t seen anything, it made me realise that I had upgraded to the latest Adobe CC release, just before experiencing the improvement.

I have since processed a lot of XT2 RAW files and all are responding very well to a traditional sharpening and processing approach in Lightroom. In a recent comparison with my Sony A7r (with which I use with Canon L Series lenses), the resulting images are similar except the Sony has slightly larger dimensions and is slightly sharper at full magnification. Both images produce an excellent print where you can’t see any difference.

Here is an example comparison at 100% magnification. The image on the left was captured using the Sony A7r whilst the image on the right is the Fuji XT2.

Sony A7r compared to Fuji XT2
Sony A7r compared to Fuji XT2

I wondered if this was just an effect when sharpening the XT2 RAW files, so I returned to my XT1 files and tested some of these. The results are also much improved. Comparing the results from Lightroom to the same file processed using the Iridient RAW converter, the gap has narrowed. The Lightroom results now appear much closer to those from Iridient when applying just Capture Sharpening. The Lightroom results can then be improved by applying Selective Sharpening in Lightroom as well as Structure adjustment with the Nik Tools.

Due to the workflow in Lightroom and my use of other cameras (Olympus EM5 and Sony RX10 & A7r) I suspect I will be using Lightroom for most of my Fuji RAW conversion. I may have occasion to venture into Iridient or RAW Therapee but where I need to work fast I think Lightroom is now up to the task.

I’m interested to hear if others have any similar experiences to share.

7 thoughts on “Fuji RAW File Processing Improvements

    Bill Stace said:
    February 9, 2017 at 11:54 am

    An interesting blog. I have recently bought a Panasonic Lumix LX100 and windows 10 does not recognise the files from it. Fortunately Camera Raw does, but the screen view of the LX 100 file in CR is not sharp. I have tried editing in camera raw, as I have done successfully with my Nikon pictures, but cannot get a satisfactory result. So I have tried Lightroom and found this to be much better producing a better all round result in terms of exposure, colour and sharpness. This now gives me a problem because I dislike having to use LR as a picture cataloguing system – one mistake (editing a file outside of LR control) and it won’t recognise the file and if you have to do more editing (with Nik software for example) you can end up with lots of copies of the file and not be sure what did what to which!! So I now have to download to my filing system with Bridge (which recognises the fling system I have been using for years), import to LR and edit, then export back to Bridge as a jpg or tiff then go to PS for any further editing. Perhaps converting my LX100 files to dng might be a better approach.

      thelightweightphotographer responded:
      February 9, 2017 at 8:33 pm

      Hi Bill, that’s an interesting problem as the Lightroom and ACR conversions should be very similar. I also don’t like the cataloguing and keywording in Lightroom and used to use the Phase One software. It is possible to integrate Lightroom and Photoshop more closely to reduce the number of image files when using editors such as Nik. I recently posted a video about this on my You Tube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYMWL3WXU9QMeOUhD3lOpEw. Have you tried other RAW converters? RAW Therapee is free and produces exceptional results with most RAW files (usually better than Adobe). The downside is the steep learning curve, although it may be worth experimenting to understand if you are giving away any image quality by using Adobe.

    Mike Shore said:
    February 10, 2017 at 9:56 am

    Hi, Robin!
    You are certainly cracking this tough nut on our behalf.
    Could you find time to record a demo video, to include “structure adjustment wth Nik Tools”.
    Best wishes

    Mike Shore said:
    February 10, 2017 at 9:59 am

    Sorry – just found “Why use Nik”!

    Dr. Lopuck, DDS said:
    February 10, 2017 at 11:49 pm

    Robin, interesting exploration on the various RAF file processing. Your pictures seem to show LR doing a very fine job of it. I am curious, have you explored On1 lately? They recently alerted me that the now are able to process RAF files. This program intrigues me as it has numerous capabilities under one roof.

    Steve

    Sent from my iPad

    >

      thelightweightphotographer responded:
      February 11, 2017 at 8:19 pm

      Thanks Steve. Yes I am an On1 user. I really like the enhancement filters they have, although I find it a little unstable and slow on my Mac desktop (top of the range). It’s a little faster on my Windows PC but a little buggy. This seems to be the way historically with On1; great tools but they often release the software a little too early (in my opinion). As I write this I’m opening a RAF file from the XT2 in the Develop module and that seems to perform reasonably well. The result is very nice with a lot of detail but the tools aren’t quite a polished as Lightroom. It does look like its worth exploring further for Fuji files though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s